Your Account | Shopping Cart


Software - FibreJet - Cluster

Fibre Channel Fabric
Connects cluster nodes and data sets through high-speed fibre optic cabling.

Mixed Storage Pool
Consolidate all storage resources in one place. All cluster nodes can access cluster data sets concurrently.

Cluster nodes
The cluster nodes crunch the data with direct high-speed access over fibre channel. If more computing power is needed they can also serve as NAS heads.

Ethernet cluster nodes
For more computing power, NAS heads serve the data set to additional nodes in the computational mix.

FibreJet lets you build bigger clusters than Xsan. Xsan is only limited to 64 nodes. FibreJet has no such limitation. Furthermore, FibreJet doesn’t degrade in performance simply because more nodes are added. Gain supercomputing power by consolidating your server and storage resources into a cluster.

The new way to access a cluster data set
Whether deploying a clusters for scientific analysis or distributed rendering, using FibreJet to access the large data set over the SAN is much better than coping with the traditional NAS file sharing method, which limits scalability and performance. The Xsan architecture is similar to NAS, but optimized to move the data directly by the SAN clients, while all the metadata is moved similar to traditional NAS — this is why Xsan suffers from similar limitations, it is the traffic cop for I/O in the SAN.

Crunch a single data pool with as many processors as you can muster
Using pure Fibre Channel architecture, you can add as much storage capacity, computer processors, and network bandwidth as the hardware limitations allow, and have FibreJet manage it all to for a extremely large, extremely fast cluster to crunch that data set. All nodes can mount the same SAN file system and read directly from the same files — no replication whatsoever.

Want even more computing power?
If you’ve done all you can on the Fibre Channel side and still need more processing power, then you can turn those SAN nodes into NAS heads or special servers and serve the data set out to even more processors over Ethernet, and on to the Internet even, if that is what you want. Because FibreJet is a truly distributed architecture, with no metadata controller bottlenecks, as you find with Xsan, it can serve out more and not bog down.

Save money, while doing more
FibreJet costs less much less than Xsan. You can save $23,383 on even a small 6-set solution, as compared to Xsan.

More Flexible Volume Management
Far superior to Apple’s Xsan, FibreJet uses standard disk utilities to control volume management. This allows multiple storage pools with different characteristics to be constructed on portions of the same storage LUNs at the same time, and reconfigured later without affecting other data on the LUNs. In Contrast, with Apple’s Xsan, you can only use entire whole LUNs at a time to create storage pools. And what’s worse, with Xsan, once a LUN is committed for a purpose, it must forevermore be used for the single purpose unless you destroy all the data on the entire volume that the storage pool is but a member. That’s why Apple’s so-call volume expansion is a joke, you can actually only add capacity to a volume in terms of another storage pool, which must be constructed again from entire whole LUNs. This means the expanded volume doesn’t benefit for example from more LUNs working together for a stripe set, but only that additional storage pool isolated — it does nothing for the rest of the volume!


FibreJet excels at building a supercomputer:

Server and Storage consolidation Aggregate storage pools, without committing forever what and how they are used. Reduce unutilized storage. Redeploy storage assets with a click.

Volume-level locking
Allows multiple servers to safely connect to a shared volume with read access, while enforcing a single writer at a time. You can still have multiple writers at the same time, they are just to different parts of the storage. This avoids issues, such as with Xsan, where multiple people will overwrite each others work without warning, such as happens with Final Cut Pro.

No Metadata Controller
Perhaps the single best feature of the FibreJet SAN. Because FibreJet as no metadata controller, it can scale in performance and capacity without limit. In contrast, with Xsan, the metadata controller is a single traffic-cop bottleneck to every I/O in the SAN, and has similar limitations as NAS. Don’t believe us? Read Apple’s own Xsan discussion board of real users for the nightmares experienced with Apple’s Xsan metadata controller, including how well the failover really works.


Xserve Cluster Node
CommandSoft can provide all your computing needs directly, as an Apple reseller.


800.447.0144

Copyright © 2005 by CommandSoft, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Google
www.commandsoft.com
Web